Legal Opinion
Tatro v. University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 11, 2011No. A10-1440PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
Relator challenges respondent university’s disciplinary sanctions, arguing that the university’s imposition of sanctions was unauthorized, arbitrary, and violated her constitutional rights. Because we conclude *814that the university properly exercised its authority to address relator’s off-campus conduct and did not violate relator’s free-speech right, and because the evidence supports the university’s finding that relator violated university rules, we affirm.
FACTS
Relator Amanda Tatro is a student in the mortuary-science program at respondent University of Minnesota. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bethel School District No. 403 v. FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tatro v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- John Doe v. University of St. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. Saint John's University, MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Vanegas v. Carleton CollegeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021