Legal Opinion

Redwood County Telephone Co. v. Luttman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1997No. C9-97-328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Jerry Luttman, the Redwood County sheriff, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment. The sheriff contends that absolute privilege protects statements that respondent Redwood County Telephone Company claims were defamatory. The district court ruled that the statements were not absolutely privileged and denied summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

All emergency 911 calls in Redwood County are received through the sheriffs department at the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP), and emergency services are dispatched by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Bol v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Carradine v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. BD. OF REGENTS OF U OF M v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ernst v. HinchliffDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  2. Buchanan v. Minnesota State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Michael Harlow v. State of Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API