Phillips v. Stark
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHORT, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendant B. Stark from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $3,920.50 as damages suffered by the p1a.int.ifF by reason of the alleged failure of the defendants to complete the purchase of a certain grocery and bakery business, which plaintiff claimed he sold to defendants for the sum of $10,000. A motion for a new trial was denied by the trial court. The appellant desires a review of the ruling of the court on said motion and a consideration of the judgment as a whole.
The testimony in the case developed the following facts:
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- McCourtney v. FortuneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Arrelano v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Lewis v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- Kramer v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. Birch Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hill v. DonnellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.