Legal Opinion

Daily v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1935No. Civ. 9699PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an application for a writ of review brought for the purpose of having annulled an order in a contempt proceeding. The alleged contempt occurred in the immediate presence of the trial court while calling the calendar. Judge Jorgensen, the trial judge, being absent on his vacation, Judge Atteridge of Santa Cruz County was presiding. At the time of the alleged contempt no action was taken. After Judge Jorgensen returned from his vacation John M. Thompson, Esq., the attorney for one of the aggrieved parties, presented to the respondent court his affidavit setting forth the facts and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hutton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. In re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Strain v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. In Re CiraoloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API