Legal Opinion
Chayo v. Kaladjian
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 9, 1994No. 91 Civ. 7021 (PKL)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This case arises out of the involuntary removal and examination, for suspected child abuse, of Chaya Mushka Chayo, Rachel Lea Chayo and Avraham Menachem- Mendel Chayo, the children of Danielle and David Chayo. Mr. and Mrs. Chayo, individually and on behalf of their children, assert a variety of causes of action, pursuant to both 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law, against Barbara Sabol, Administrator of the New York City Human. Resources Administration (“HRA”), Lisa Rollins, Sherri Rickson, Earline Epps and Edwise Brunache (the “Caseworkers”), Lee Brown,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tenenbaum v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Schwimmer v. KaladjianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Haussman v. FergusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Callahan v. Lancaster-Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Tenenbaum Ex Rel. Tenenbaum v. WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.