Legal Opinion
Tenenbaum Ex Rel. Tenenbaum v. Williams
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1994No. 1:91-cr-00037PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b); plaintiffs cross-move for partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a).
Defendants’ motion is denied in part and granted in part; plaintiffs’ cross-motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
In September 1989, plaintiffs Marc and Mary Tenenbaum (“the Tenenbaums”) en rolled their daughter Sarah in kindergarten at P.S. 230 in Brooklyn. Sarah suffers from “elective mutism,” meaning that she does not speak to people outside of her home.
At P.S. 230, Sarah…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tenenbaum v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- J.B. v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Trombley v. O'NeillDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Kia P. v. McIntyreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Dietz v. DamasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.