Legal Opinion
Haussman v. Fergus
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 1995No. 91 Civ. 7443 (PKL)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is an action brought by John Haussman (“Haussman”) against E.S. Fergus (“Fergus”), John Doe (“Doe”), “John” Holmes (“Holmes”), Richard Roe (“Roe”), J.C. Mondello (“Maldonado”) 1 and two other unknown defendants. Plaintiff brings the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and seeks recovery for violation of his constitutional rights by defendant police officers. Plaintiff alleges that he was arrested and searched without probable cause, punished without due process, confined, and prosecuted by defendants. Defendant Fergus now moves for…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ali v. ConnickDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Kelly v. RiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Schallop v. New York State Department of LawDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Carrillos v. Incorporated VillageDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Genovese v. Town of SouthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.