Legal Opinion

Schwimmer v. Kaladjian

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 9, 1997No. 92 CIV. 2376(SWK)PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KRAM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Morris Sehwimmer and Rifka Schwimmer (collectively, the “Schwimmers”) bring this action challenging the allegedly unlawful removal of their minor son, plaintiff Yoel Schwimmer (‘Yoel”), the allegedly unlawful x-rays taken of Yoel and the non-consensual physical examinations of minor plaintiffs Devorah Sehwimmer, Berish Schwimmer, Faiga Dina Schwimmer, David Schwimmer, Yoel Schwimmer and Rachel Yachet Schwimmer (collectively, the “Schwimmer children”). Plaintiffs also challenge the defendants’ practices, patterns and policies…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Tenenbaum v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Marinelli v. City of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. People United for Children, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Sykes Ex Rel. Estate of Purnell v. McPhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
  5. Kia P. v. McIntyreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API