Burgos-Seberos v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Eudaldo Burgos-Seberos appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after a jury convicted him of possessing more than three ounces of marihuana.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The appellant presents the following issues, which are phrased as statements, for our review on appeal:
I: The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress the marijuana found in his vehicle, since Appellant did not voluntarily consent to the search.
II: Appellant did not voluntarily waive his constitutional right to testify since he did not understand either the rights themselves or the concept…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Thomas Stanley WerkingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Damato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Garvin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Putnam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.