Legal Opinion

Burgos-Seberos v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1998No. 97-329PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Eudaldo Burgos-Seberos appeals from the judgment and sentence entered after a jury convicted him of possessing more than three ounces of marihuana.

We affirm.

ISSUES

The appellant presents the following issues, which are phrased as statements, for our review on appeal:

I: The trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress the marijuana found in his vehicle, since Appellant did not voluntarily consent to the search.

II: Appellant did not voluntarily waive his constitutional right to testify since he did not understand either the rights themselves or the concept…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Thomas Stanley WerkingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Damato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Garvin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Putnam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API