Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Stanley Werking
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1990No. 89-8093PublishedCited by 148 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Thomas Stanley Werking, entered a conditional plea of guilty under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(a)(2) in federal district court to possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. section 841(a)(1). 1 Werking’s plea was conditioned on his right to bring this appeal challenging the district court’s refusal to suppress evidence of approximately seventy-five pounds of marijuana that a highway patrolman obtained in a warrantless search of the vehicle Werking was driving. Werking contends the district court erred in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by148 opinions
- Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Carlos Botero-OspinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Miguel SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Edelmiro Augustin FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jaime Soto, Also Known as Leonel GuerraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.