Legal Opinion
United States v. Miguel Sandoval
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1994No. 93-4226PublishedCited by 278 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Miguel Sandoval (“Sandoval”) was indicted for possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). Sandoval filed a motion to suppress the evidence of the cocaine itself on the ground that it had been obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. After an evidentiary hearing the district court denied that motion (829 F.Supp. 355 (D. Utah 1993), cited “Opinion at -”). 1 Sandoval then entered a guilty plea conditioned on his right to appeal the suppression ruling pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2). We…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by278 opinions
- Jose Chavez v. James ZiglarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Terry L. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- McWilliams v. State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
273 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.