Legal Opinion
Putnam v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided February 29, 2000No. 99-29PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
Appellant James Putnam pleaded guilty to one count of possession of methamphetamine in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031 conditioned upon his appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Finding no error in the district court’s decision denying the motion, we affirm.
ISSUES
Appellant presents the following issues for review:
1. Whether the District Court erred in concluding the continued investigative detention of Mr. Putnam was legitimate when the Officer could point to no articula-ble fact supporting a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity?
2…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Meadows v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Morgan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.