Legal Opinion
Lever v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1939No. Civ. 6039PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEEL, J., pro tem.
—The plaintiffs brought this action for a declaration of their rights under certain written instruments attached to the complaint as exhibits. They seek to have the plaintiff Marie L. Lever declared to be the owner in fee of a certain lot or parcel of land, and by reason thereof entitled to a proportional share or benefit in the income accruing under a community oil and gas lease covering this and other lots. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendants appeal. .
The property covered b3r the lease comprises a city block divided into lots in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Richfield Oil Co. of California v. Hercules Gasoline Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Orange Cove Water Co. v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Wohlford v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tanner v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Payne v. CallahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Yearout v. American Pipe & Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Kier Corp. v. Treasure Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.