Legal Opinion

Kier Corp. v. Treasure Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1943No. Civ. 13948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

This action had its genesis in an oil lease executed by the Kier Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Kier. The lease contemplated that other parcels contiguous to the leased lots should be acquired from the owner under a lease similar in form to that given by Kier, that the combined area should be operated as a community lease and that the royalties were to be apportioned according to the areas described in the respective leases. This action was instituted to obtain an accounting of the royalties alleged to have accrued under the Kier lease. Inasmuch as the appeal of Kier is to be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. McIntire's Administrator v. BondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. In re Estate of DelaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Lass v. EliassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. United States v. 70.39 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  3. Kreisa v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Kay v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Bronson v. GillanMontana Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API