Legal Opinion
Payne v. Callahan
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1940No. Civ. 2508PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment against plaintiffs in an action wherein they sought to quiet their titles to one quarter of one per cent in each, in the hydrocarbons “produced in and under” certain real estate in the Santa Fe Springs Oil District in Los Angeles County; for an accounting, and for other relief not necessary to specify here.
The defendant Callahan is the same person who was the plaintiff Callahan in the case of Callahan v. Martin, 3 Cal. (2d) 110 [43 Pac. (2d) 788, 101 A. L. R. 871], and the same land and lease are involved in both actions. There is this important difference in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Association v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, United States of America, Real Parties in Interest. Columbia River Fishermen's Protective Union, Inc., Petitioners v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, and United States of America, Real Parties in Interest-Appellees. United States of America v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Yearout v. American Pipe & Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Buller v. BullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.