Legal Opinion
Richfield Oil Co. of California v. Hercules Gasoline Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 10, 1931No. Docket No. 7742PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for an injunction and for an accounting. The interveners entered the litigation for the aid of plaintiff. Judgment went for plaintiff and interveners, awarding them a permanent injunction and damages. The defendants appeal upon a bill of exceptions.
Plaintiff and one Horwitz executed a written contract whereby the former agreed to purchase and the latter agreed to sell and deliver the crude oil which Horwitz might produce from a certain well being sunk in the Alamitos Heights district. Deliveries were to be made from the tanks of the owner located on the property to which the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Western Oil & Refining Co. v. Venago Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.