Legal Opinion

Fortner v. J. K. Holding Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1987No. 685A86PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The sole question on appeal before this Court is whether the plaintiffs accident arose out of and in the course of her employment. We hold that it did not, and accordingly affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Before turning to a consideration of this issue, however, we must first address one preliminary matter. In plaintiffs new brief filed with this Court, in place of a new argument, her attorney included a statement incorporating by reference into the new brief the argument contained in plaintiffs brief before the Court of Appeals. Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Cole v. GUILFORD COUNTY AND HARTFORD ACC. & IND. CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Hoffman v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. S.N.R. Management Corp. v. Danube Partners 141, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Dye v. Shippers Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Wiley v. L3 Commc'ns Vertex Aerospace, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Stark v. N.C. Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Graven v. N.C. Dept. of Public Safety-Division of Law EnforcementCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API