Stark v. N.C. Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, Judge.
Rufus Stark and Betty Stark (“petitioners”) appeal from an order of the trial court affirming the Final Agency Decision of the North Carolina Mining Commission (the “Mining Commission”). We affirm.
I. Background
Respondent Harrison Construction, Division of APAC Atlantic, Inc. (“Harrison”), holds Mining Permit No. 22-06, authorizing opera*493tion of a crushed stone quarry known as the Hayesville Quarry in Clay County, North Carolina. The Hayesville Quarry is located in the vicinity of Shewbird Mountain. Harrison’s permit was issued by respondent North Carolina Department of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- S.N.R. Management Corp. v. Danube Partners 141, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley Woodcraft, Inc. v. BoddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Wiley v. L3 Commc'ns Vertex Aerospace, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- N.C. Dep't of Envtl. Quality v. N.C. Rules Rev. Comm'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026