Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The specific findings of fact, are supported by competent evidence. Defendants, by brief, assert that they do not “quibble” with the findings of fact set forth in paragraph 4, quoted above.
Specific findings of fact by the Industrial Commission are required. These must cover the crucial questions of fact upon which plaintiff’s right to compensation depends. Singleton v. Laundry Co., 213 N.C. 32, 195 S.E. 34; Gowens v. Alamance County, 214 N.C. 18, 197 S.E. 538; Farmer v. Lumber Co., 217 N.C. 158, 7 S.E. 2d 376; Cook v. Lumber Co., 217 N.C. 161, 7 S.E. 2d 378. Otherwise, this Court cannot…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Lockey v. . Cohen, Goldman Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Starr v. Charlotte Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.