Legal Opinion

Stephens v. ROGERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1966No. 517PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' DIMOND, • Justice.

' This is a. dispute over the ownership and right to [ possession of a 40 acre tract of land. Appellant purchased, the property at a.SpenaJd'P'uhlic Utility District tax foreclosure salé'in 1956.' He contends that his title is paramount tó tliat asserted by appel-lee, Rogers ; Construction ■ Company. The lattePs claim of''ownership is based upon a eontíéjíamee'' by warranty deed, from appel-lee; Porter,' in 1958, which was made after the-prdperty^had befen sold at the tax foreclosure' sál&

'The "ífiái court held that the tax foreclosure sale was invalid because the Spe-nard…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hill v. MoeAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Anchorage Independent School District v. StephensAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska v. John Does 1-6Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Alascom, Inc. v. North Slope Borough, Board of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API