Stephens v. ROGERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
' DIMOND, • Justice.
' This is a. dispute over the ownership and right to [ possession of a 40 acre tract of land. Appellant purchased, the property at a.SpenaJd'P'uhlic Utility District tax foreclosure salé'in 1956.' He contends that his title is paramount tó tliat asserted by appel-lee, Rogers ; Construction ■ Company. The lattePs claim of''ownership is based upon a eontíéjíamee'' by warranty deed, from appel-lee; Porter,' in 1958, which was made after the-prdperty^had befen sold at the tax foreclosure' sál&
'The "ífiái court held that the tax foreclosure sale was invalid because the Spe-nard…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hill v. MoeAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Anchorage Independent School District v. StephensAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska v. John Does 1-6Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Alascom, Inc. v. North Slope Borough, Board of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.