Legal Opinion

Catholic Bishop of Northern Alaska v. John Does 1-6

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2006No. S-11295PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Six unnamed plaintiffs allege that they were subjected to childhood sexual abuse by a Catholic priest in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. They filed suit against the priest’s former employers in 2003. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations. The superior court held the motion in abeyance pending further discovery. The defendants petitioned for review and we granted their petition in order to clarify the law that applies to this case.

We conclude that AS 09.10.065 does not revive civil claims that were time-barred before…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Adkins v. StanselAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. JefferyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API