Legal Opinion
Hill v. Moe
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1961No. 87PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
This case arose out of a labor dispute between the appellants and appellees. 1 The court below held that it had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action because exclusive jurisdiction was vested by federal law in the National Labor Relations Board. Whether the court was correct is the question to be decided on this appeal.
The employer owned and operated a retail grocery store and meat market in the City of Fairbanks. In October 1954 the employees of the grocery department, who were members of the Retail Clerks Union, went on strike and commenced to picket the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- City & Borough of Juneau v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Stephens v. ROGERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANYAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Watts v. Seward School BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- State, Department of Revenue v. Alaska Pulp America, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.