Legal Opinion
Filippi v. City of Erie
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 6, 2009No. 2060 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Richard Filippi (Filippi) appeals, pro se, from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County (trial court) which granted the preliminary objections of the City of Erie Pennsylvania (City), the United National Group (Group), Diamond State Insurance Company (Diamond), Insurance Management Company (Insurance) and Swett & Crawford (S & CXcollectively, Appellees) and dismissed Filippi’s case against each Appellee, as Group, Diamond, Insurance and S & C do not owe a legal duty to Filippi because the City does not have a legal duty to obtain insurance coverage…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Renk v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Schenck v. K.E. David, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- HAWKS BY HAWKS v. LivermoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Wiernik v. PHH U.S. Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Myers-Macomber Engineers v. M. L. W. Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Dershaw v. Ciardi (In re Rite Way Electric, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Seitz v. Frorer (In re Covenant Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Smith v. Carolina Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Rizzo v. MSA, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.