Legal Opinion

Wiernik v. PHH U.S. Mortgage Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 2, 1999PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 As the saying goes, sometimes it is not the amount of money at stake, but the principle of the matter that counts. Here, we are presented with a rather unwieldy and confusing case that, in the end, asks whether appellees owe appellants less than $20. After reviewing the central legal issues at hand, it becomes clear that here the principle of the matter means everything.

¶2 As summarized by the trial court, the facts of the case are relatively straightforward:

This matter involved a class action in which Plaintiff brings a claim on behalf of himself and others who have entered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. MacElree v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. C.B. v. J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Alpart v. General Land Partners, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Gutteridge v. J3 Energy Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API