Legal Opinion
Rizzo v. MSA, Inc.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Decided November 5, 2010No. 06 CV 3330PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEALON, J.,
Following a non-jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Bryan Rizzo (“Rizzo”) on his direct claim and in favor of defendant MSA, Inc. (“MSA”) on its counterclaim, both parties filed motions for post-trial relief seeking judgment in their favor with respect to the other party’s verdict against them. The credible evidence at trial established that: (1) the parties mutually agreed to extend the original completion date for their real estate transaction due to construction delays attributable to a third party contractor; (2) Rizzo breached the parties’ amended agreement by refusing to close…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McShea v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Torchia on Behalf of Torchia v. TorchiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Stoeckinger v. Presidential Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Northeast Fence & Iron Works, Inc. v. Murphy Quigley Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Czarkowski v. Jennings, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013
- Dunbar v. Rivello, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013
- Peoples Neighborhood Bank v. Layo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2014
- Scott Township Sewer & Water Autority v. Tellip, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2015