Legal Opinion

Myers-Macomber Engineers v. M. L. W. Construction Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1979No. 58PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Does a mortgagee who goes into possession of an incomplete condominium development upon default in the terms of a mortgage by the mortgagor owe a duty to use undistributed mortgage funds to satisfy the mortgagor’s unpaid debts? The lower court held that a mortgagee in possession becomes a quasi trustee with a responsibility to satisfy outstanding, job related claims against the mortgagor. We disagree and reverse.

M.L.W. Construction Corporation was the owner and developer of a series of condominiums on a nineteen acre tract in East Pennsboro Township, Cumberland County. HNC…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. VollrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Provident Trust Co. v. Judicial B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Binns v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. DeGasperi v. VALICENTI Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Winthrop v. Arthur W. Binns, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Schenck v. K.E. David, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Charles R. Peterson, in No. 80-2662 v. Crown Financial Corporation, a Corporation, in No. 80-2663Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. D.A. Hill Co. v. Clevetrust Realty InvestorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API