Legal Opinion

Schenck v. K.E. David, Ltd.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1995No. 02930PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Kenneth E. David (hereinafter “David”) and K.E. David, Ltd. (together, “appellants”), appeal from the August 9, 1994 entry of judgment following a nonjury verdict in favor of appellees 1 in the amount of $82,000 plus interest.

Between 1987 and 1989, appellee Schenck represented appellants in a federal criminal antitrust trial, at which appellants were acquitted of all charges. Subsequently, Schenck represented appellants in civil antitrust proceedings brought by various parties, one of which was the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth sought in excess of $225,-000 in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Styer v. HugoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Wolf v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Myers-Macomber Engineers v. M. L. W. Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Van Buskirk v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Milby, L. v. Pote, C. v. Southern ChristrianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. AmeriPro Search, Inc. v. Fleming Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Shafer Electric & Construction v. MantiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API