Legal Opinion

Barkell v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2002No. 00-223PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T 1] On January 25, 2000, a jury conviet-ed Gerald P. Barkell (Barkell) of two counts of third degree sexual assault in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-804(a)@i) (LexisNexis 2001). On appeal, Barkell challenges his convictions based on the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel. We find that Barkell has not overcome the strong presumption that his counsel rendered adequate assistance and affirm his convictions.

ISSUES

[12] Barkell states the issues as follows:

I. Did [trial counsel's] failure to conduct an adequate investigation, failure to effectively examine witnesses…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frias v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sincock v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Teniente v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API