Legal Opinion

Miranda Rose Mraz v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2016No. S-15-0175PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[T1] A jury convicted Miranda Mraz of seven counts of felony forgery and one count of misdemeanor theft arising out of charges that as a server at a restaurant she altered credit card receipts to increase the amount of her tips, On appeal, Ms. Mraz asserts that her conviction should be reversed on grounds of vindictive prosecution, ineffective assistance of counsel, prosecutorial misconduct, failure to provide supplemental instructions to the jury, and insufficiency of the evidence, We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Ms. Mraz states the issues on appeal as follows: '

I,. Were Ms. Mraz's due…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Thigpen v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Farrow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Danell Blevins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Thompson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Martin Alan Ridinger v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Charles Alfred Armajo v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API