State ex rel. Truckey v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteRN, J.
Eelator contends in his complaint that the uncontradicted facts clearly and convincingly establish that he was injured as a,result of a violation of Section IC-5-09.03(A) of Bulletin IC-5.1 If this contention is correct, the Industrial Commission must award relator an amount as prescribed in Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution.
Eespondent contends that the writ should not issue unless an abuse of discretion by the Industrial Commission can be shown. This statement of the law cannot be disputed, for Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, provides exclusive jurisdiction in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- State ex rel. Szekely v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Cox v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.