State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrey, J.
Appellee Humble was working on a mechanical power press when injured. This power press is a device con*78sisting, essentially, of a base and ram which goes up and down. Dies are attached to the base and the ram, and metal is inserted between the dies. In the operating cycle the ram comes down under great pressure and the metal is pressed between the two dies to be formed into the desired shape. Because of the danger to the operator, the Industrial Commission has promulgated rules requiring the use of safety devices to prevent an operator’s hands from being caught between the dies during the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Szekely v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Truckey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Capital City Excavating Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by30 opinions
- State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.