Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Szekely v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1968No. 68-126PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

In rendering its judgment the Court of Appeals apparently disregarded that part of Section 4123.68 (W), Revised Code (formerly Section 1465-68», General Code), which reads:

“Compensation and * * * expenses on account of silicosis are payable * # * only in the event of such disability or death resulting within eight years after the last injurious exposure. In the event of death following con*239tinuous total disability commencing within eight years after the last injurious exposure, the requirement of death within eight years after the last injurious exposure does not apply.”

Furthermore, under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Drakulich v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Weaver v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Bevis v. CoffinberryOhio Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hutton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. M. T. D. Products, Inc. v. StebbinsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. WickhamOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Breno v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API