Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cox v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1981No. 80-1527PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

First, it must be noted that the Court of Appeals held Ohio Adm. Code 4121-3-18(A)(l)(b)1 invalid as being in conflict with R. C. 4121.35(C), whereas, as stated, the rule which was in effect at the time of this matter was 4121-3-20(F)2. However, it appears that the same basic procedures were followed under the old rule as now under the new rule, and the underlying issue remains as to whether either rule, in the furtherance of the provisions of R. C. 4121.06(A), conflicts with R. C. 4121.35(C).

In issuing its writ of mandamus, the Court of Appeals held that R. C. 4121.35(C) mandates an appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Humble v. Mark Concepts, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Truckey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Capital City Excavating Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Berry v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API