Legal Opinion
Smulson v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1941No. Civ. 12655PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
Proceedings were taken against pe titioner, a licensed dentist, before the State Board of Dental Examiners, on charges that he had been guilty of unprofessional conduct. After a hearing, the board found the charges to be true and suspended his license to practice dentistry for a period of two years. He then filed in the superior court a petition for a writ of mandate to compel the board to vacate its suspension of his license. The superior court gave judgment against him, from which he appeals.
On appeal he makes three contentions: that the statute under which the proceedings…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Armenta v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Rudolph v. Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. DanielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Stuck v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.