Legal Opinion
People v. Daniel
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
168 Cal.App.2d Supp. 788 (1959)
THE PEOPLE, Appellant,
v.
AUGUST LEE DANIEL, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals.
Feb. 16, 1959.
Frank S. Pierson, District Attorney (Stanislaus), and Gerald R. Douglas, Deputy District Attorney, for Appellant.
George Mellis and Mellis & Stockton for Respondent.
CHAMBERLAIN, J.
The defendant August Lee Daniel hereafter called the defendant, was charged with being a "common drunkard" in violation of subdivision 11 of section 647 of the California Penal Code, known as the vagrancy statute.
He has never been arraigned. His counsel moved the court to dismiss the action…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Eckl v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. PoulinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Sultan Turkish Bath, Inc. v. BOARD OF POLICE COMRS. OF CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.