Legal Opinion
People v. Associated Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 12311PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is a petition for a writ of supersedeas to stay the effect of a preliminary injunction pending an appeal therefrom by the petitioners herein.
The action was commenced in the county of Los Angeles on September 11, 1929, and in the name of the People on the Relation of Fred G. Stevenot, Director of Natural Resources of the State of California against some forty-three defendants who are oil producers owning oil-wells and leases in the Santa Fe oil-field in said county. The purpose of the action is to restrain the alleged unreasonable waste of natural gas from the wells of the defendants. In…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.