Legal Opinion
Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 1, 1935No. 538PublishedCited by 407 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
This case presents the question of the validity of a statute of the State of Oregon, enacted in 1933, relating to the conduct of dentists. Oregon Laws, 1933, Chapter 166. Previous legislation had provided for the revocation of licenses for unprofessional conduct, which, as then defined, included advertising of an untruthful and misleading nature. The Act of 1933 amended the definition so as to provide the following additional grounds for revocation:
"... advertising professional superiority or the performance of professional services in a superior manner; advertising prices for professional…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by407 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
402 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.