Legal Opinion
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lathen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1982No. SC 28725PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue is whether the accused was required by the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Conduct to withdraw as counsel from the conduct of a trial. DR 5-102(A) provides:
“If, after undertaking employment in contemplated or pending litigation, a lawyer learns or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as a witness on behalf of his client, he shall withdraw from the conduct of the trial and his firm, if any, shall not continue representation in the trial, except that he may continue the representation and he or a lawyer in his firm may testify in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. PierettiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KinseyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.