Cook v. Michael
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is an action of assault and battery which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $1,000 general damages and $1,000 punitive damages. The defendant presents four assignments of error. Under the first assignment the defendant asserts that the court erred in sustaining the objection to the following question put to the plaintiff on cross-examination: “Q You think you should honestly be entitled to $20,000 punitive damages, Mr. Cook?” It is the defendant’s theory that the prayer for punitive damages was a matter in issue, that the defendant was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Willoughby v. DriscollOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- McVay v. ByarsOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. N. B. Lesher, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.