Legal Opinion
State v. Pieretti
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 26, 1991No. 8905-96077; CA A61205PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Defendant appeals from an involuntary commitment order. ORS 426.130. He asserts that he was denied due process and that he is not mentally ill. ORS 426.005(2). We review de novo, State v. O’Neill, 274 Or 59, 61, 545 P2d 97 (1976), and affirm.
On May 17, 1989, 2 of defendant’s friends filed a notification that they believed that he was mentally ill. See ORS 426.070(1). They reported that he was delusional and had threatened to kill them, his psychiatrist, his estranged wife and her attorney. After a pre-commitment investigation, the court issued a citation on May 24, ordering that a commitment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Cole v. STATE BY & THROUGH OR. DEPT. OF REV.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WoolridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Carter v. Ladee Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BodellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. R. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.