Wetzel v. Pius
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, J., pro tem.
This is an action for damages against a physician and surgeon for malpractice in negligently setting the femur bone in plaintiff’s leg.
In his complaint plaintiff charges that on or about the seventeenth day of May, 1922, he broke this bone in his right leg, and, relying upon the skill of defendant, employed him to attend to the injury and to give him such care and treatment as was usual and necessary in such eases to effect a cure. Continuing, plaintiff charges that defendant so negligently and unskillfully conducted himself in attempting to set the leg that the ends of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Krebenios v. LindauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Coady v. ReinsMontana Supreme Court · 1872
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Johnson v. St. Patrick's HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.