Legal Opinion

Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1944No. L. A. 19058PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Plaintiff appealed from a judgment entered on an order sustaining a demurrer to Ms complaint without leave to amend. The complaint alleges the following facts:

On September 3, 1930, the plaintiff was a passenger on a streetcar being operated negligently by the defendant. He suffered an injury from glass splinters which pierced the right eyeball. The defendant directed the plaintiff to go to certain eye specialists employed by it. The plaintiff submitted to treatment by the defendant’s employed physicians and at defendant’s expense. His eye was examined by them and they removed splinters of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Kimball v. Pacific Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1934

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API