Legal Opinion

Barham v. Widing

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4404PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this cause that portion of the opinion of Mr. Justice Thompson, heretofore rendered by the Honorable District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District, which contains a statement of the facts and issues involved, as well as its disposition of appellant’s contentions with reference to admissions of alleged prejudicial evidence and insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, has our approval and is hereby adopted as a portion of the opinion of this court herein as follows, to wit:

“This is an appeal from a judgment against the defendant for damages resulting from malpractice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Dimock v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Ley v. BishoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API