Legal Opinion

Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1918No. S. F. No. 7488PublishedCited by 43 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant after its demurrer had been sustained to the plaintiffs’ first amended complaint, the latter declining to further amend. The first amended complaint alleged in substance that at some date prior to October 11, 1913, the plaintiff Margaret A. Harding had entered into a contract with the defendant, a corporation operating a hospital and carrying on therein “the general business of furnishing medicines and medical and surgical treatment, ambulance and hospital care to the sick and injured,” by the terms of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lehman v. Amsterdam Coffee Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Krebenios v. LindauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Marty v. SomersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stephen J. Kozan v. Dr. Glenn E. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Kimball v. Pacific Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1934

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API