Legal Opinion

Denning v. State

California Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1899No. S. F. No. 1379PublishedCited by 60 opinions

APPEAL from a-judgment of the Superior Court of the City- and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Bahrs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff, Denning, was employed by the board of state harbor commissioners as a night deckhand upon a tug-boat—the “Governor Irwin” —belonging to the state, and used by said board. Among other duties of the plaintiff as a deckhand, it is alleged he was required to place lights on the top of the cabin on each side, and for this purpose climbed a ladder eight or nine feet high reaching from the deck to the top of the cabin; that the ladder was insecurely fastened and became detached at one side and caused the plaintiff to fall, whereby he sustained serious injuries, and to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Melvin v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Daggett v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bourn v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Eads v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API