Legal Opinion

Hill v. Clark

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1908No. Civ. No. 413PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment, the evidence taken at the trial being presented in a bill of exceptions.

The action was one brought by plaintiff to foreclose a lien-on account of certain work and labor performed in grading a tract of land under a written contract with defendant, the owner. This contract specified the exact lines of grade to which the premises should be brought, and for which work the plaintiff was to receive $1,000 upon completion. Upon the-trial the plaintiff did not show that he had complied with the contract in any manner other than as required by his construction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Builders' Supply Depot v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Harlan v. StufflebeemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Schindler v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mills v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Producers Holding Co. v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bryan Elevator Co. v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Appliance Co. v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Watterson v. HillMontana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API