Legal Opinion

Appliance Co. v. Kelley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1929No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Plaintiff filed its action in the Superior Court against defendants to recover a balance due it under a contract to install an 1 ice-box and display ease and refrigerating machinery and equipment in a store being erected by the defendant, Joseph C. Kelley, as contractor, for the defendants and appellants, Tony Berardino and Rose Berardino, as owners. Appellants filed their cross-complaint against their co-defendant asking for damages, but it was stipulated by all parties at the trial that upon his deposit of $549 in court no judgment would be taken against him. Respondent recovered judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaume v. SheetsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. List v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Spencer v. DeemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Boomer v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Hill v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Tooele Co. Bd. of Ed. v. Hadlock, State Bank Com'rUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Joshua Tree Townsite Co. v. Joshua Tree Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Robinson v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API