Schindler v. Green
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. John D. Moynahan, C. E. Elliott, and Hinkson & Elliott, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action is brought by an original contractor against defendants as owners of a lot in the city of Sacramento, to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. A written contract was made by plaintiff with Annie and Maggie Green, daughters of defendants in the action, who lived on the premises with their parents, said defendants, to do the carpenter-work in making alterations and adding two rooms to the house in which defendants lived. The plastering of the rooms was to be done by another person, under a separate contract, with which plaintiff had nothing to do. There were no regular plans or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Harlan v. StufflebeemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re TildenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Mott v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Seebach v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Hill v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Conrad v. FoerstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.