Bryan Elevator Co. v. Law
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. B. V. Sargent, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
In the first count of the complaint plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of sixteen thousand dollars upon a written contract entered into by plaintiff and defendant, January 20, 1905, for the construction and installation of an elevator plant and service by plaintiff for the Monadnock Building, San Francisco. The second count was for necessary repairs to the elevators, elevator equipments, and elevator hatchways in said building of the alleged value of $4,604.33. The third count is for elevator parts and supplies alleged to have 'been sold and delivered to defendant by plaintiff, for which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowen v. KimbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Hawkins v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Keeler v. CliffordIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Shepard v. MillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Harlan v. StufflebeemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Bruner v. HegyiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Scott Co. Inc. v. RolkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Melton v. StoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.