Legal Opinion

Watterson v. Hill

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1929No. 6,428PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ang-Stman

This is an action to recover on a promissory note in the principal sum of $1,542.50, executed and delivered by defendant to plaintiff in January, 1922, and due one year from its date. The complaint sets forth a copy of the note, alleges its ownership by plaintiff, and nonpayment. The answer admits the execution and delivery of the note, and denies the other allegations of the complaint.

By way of affirmative defense the answer alleges, in substance, that before the maturity of the note, it was indorsed by plaintiff in blank and delivered to the First National Bank of Lewistown; that thereafter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Rindge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Stanley v. WestoverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Pure Oil Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wallingford v. AlcornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Averill Machinery Co. v. BainMontana Supreme Court · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. ConradMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API